Case Studies Objection to Processing
Unlawful processing of special category data
A data subject issued a complaint to the Data Protection Commission (DPC) against their employer (data controller) regarding the processing of their health data under Article 9 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The data subject explained to the DPC that they had been signed off work by their GP and so, presented their medical certificate to their employer, in an envelope addressed to the organisation’s Medical Officer. A staff member in an acting-up manager role, opened the medical cert; however, this person’s role was not as a medical officer. Before contacting the DPC the data subject contacted their employer to address their concerns that they felt their sensitive personal data had been unlawfully processed; however, they did not receive a response to their complaint.
As part of its examination, the DPC engaged with the data controller and shared the details of the data subject’s complaint. The data controller responded to the DPC and explained that, as per their organisation’s Standard Operating Procedures, as there was no medical officer on duty on the day in question, the responsibility and authority for granting leave, sick or otherwise, automatically falls to the manager on the day, who in this instance was the manager who processed the medical certificate. The data subject did not accept the explanation provided by the data controller and contested that a medical certificate should not be processed by anyone who is not the designated medical office.
Through its examination, the DPC found that, under Articles 6(1)(b), (c), (f) and 9(2)(b) of the GDPR the data controller had legitimate bases to process the data subject’s sensitive personal data under the GDPR and so no unlawful processing had occurred. No further action against the data controller was considered necessary in relation to the data subject’s complaint.